You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Many users are reporting the unreasonable model output (e.g. #88, #86).
This is mainly due to the fact that the input data are rather un-plausible (e.g. climate, parameters, ...). It would be worth to include more checks and warnings as previously already suggested (e.g. #73, #8).
To include:
Check wether climate data are outside of the hard ranges
Check wether site data are outside plausible range
Check wether species data are outside plausible range
Warn when the default parameters are used (different species e.g.)
[ ]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Many users are reporting the unreasonable model output (e.g. #88, #86).
This is mainly due to the fact that the input data are rather un-plausible (e.g. climate, parameters, ...). It would be worth to include more checks and warnings as previously already suggested (e.g. #73, #8).
To include:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: