You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Unlike in the interaction case, we might want to preserve the ATE by simulating a HTE where the main effect is a function of some third variable, centred on $\mu$ . So:
$\tilde{X}$ -- a sample from the ESS-trained SyGNet model with $n$ observations
$\tilde{y} \in \tilde{X}$ -- some outcome of interest from the synthetic data
$\tilde{z} \in \tilde{X}$ -- some variable already present in the synthetic data
$\mu, \sigma$ -- hypothesized treatment effect and noise parameters for the main effect
One further complication we could add is a parameter $\psi$ to control the amount of heterogeneity: $\tilde{z}_\text{Z-score} = \psi \times \frac{\tilde{z} - \text{Mean}(\tilde{z})}{\text{StdDev}(\tilde{z})}$,
and then we keep the same outcome equation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks to @antndlcrx we now have the basic treatment shock function. I will work up a demo for this at some point.
Looking forward, there are two further types of treatment shock we should model.
Interactive effects
In the first instance, what if we assume beyond the main effect there is an interaction effect with another variable in the data? Suppose:
We can then simulate a scenario where:
Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (HTE)
Unlike in the interaction case, we might want to preserve the ATE by simulating a HTE where the main effect is a function of some third variable, centred on$\mu$ . So:
We can simulate a scenario where:
One further complication we could add is a parameter$\psi$ to control the amount of heterogeneity:
$\tilde{z}_\text{Z-score} = \psi \times \frac{\tilde{z} - \text{Mean}(\tilde{z})}{\text{StdDev}(\tilde{z})}$ ,
and then we keep the same outcome equation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: