You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Document number: DXXXXR0
Date: 20XX-MM-DD
Audience: EWG
Reply-to: Tony Van Eerd. tt at forecode.com
Summary
Current looping mechanisms (forloops, while and do...while loops)
are great - in their niche uses;
but they are often found wanting, resulting in awkward constructs.
In particular, in a few cases it is impossible to NOT repeat yourself (ie a violation of DRY) or to be concise, using those mechanisms.
Looking at how all these mechanisms work, we can refactor them into a single, more general, control flow mechanism.
In fact, it could replace all the other keywords with this single mechanism!
(Note, for the sake of backwards compatibility, we do not recommend deprecation at this time.
If the new style is widely adopted - as we expect it will - we can deprecate the old keywords
when common coding practices show they have fallen out of favour.)
Extra Checks
DRY and Concise
bool res = false;
for(int retry = 10; !res && retry; retry--)
{
res = askHardware(question, &num);
// don't know why it succeeds while failing,
// but it does. :-(
// Sadly, re-asking is the solution.
if (res && num == 0) {
sleepHack(200);
continue;
}
}
return res;
// pre-conditions
bool res; // undetermined
int retry = 10;
// invariant
// retry >= 0
// post-conditions
auto post_condition = bool [res, num, retry](){
res && num == 0 || retry == 0
}
do{
int num;
sleepHack(200);
res = askHardware(question, &num);
--retry; // advances state - must terminate
}
while(! post_condition());
return res;
More Elucidating Examples
... show more problematic uses of current control flow, compared against new mechanism
Proof of Replacement
... show before/after table replacing each of { for, while and do...while }
Technical Details or Preliminary Wording, Etc
Label statements, goto statement. Etc.
Further Work
Initial results suggest a "computed goto" could also replace if and switch statements - thus completely replacing all control flow mechanisms with a single keyword. The committee should give me a kidney.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Going Towards a More General Looping Mechanism
Document number: DXXXXR0
Date: 20XX-MM-DD
Audience: EWG
Reply-to: Tony Van Eerd. tt at forecode.com
Summary
Current looping mechanisms (
for
loops,while
anddo
...while
loops)are great - in their niche uses;
but they are often found wanting, resulting in awkward constructs.
In particular, in a few cases it is impossible to NOT repeat yourself (ie a violation of DRY) or to be concise, using those mechanisms.
Looking at how all these mechanisms work, we can refactor them into a single, more general, control flow mechanism.
In fact, it could replace all the other keywords with this single mechanism!
(Note, for the sake of backwards compatibility, we do not recommend deprecation at this time.
If the new style is widely adopted - as we expect it will - we can deprecate the old keywords
when common coding practices show they have fallen out of favour.)
More Elucidating Examples
... show more problematic uses of current control flow, compared against new mechanism
Proof of Replacement
... show before/after table replacing each of {
for
,while
anddo
...while
}Technical Details or Preliminary Wording, Etc
Label statements, goto statement. Etc.
Further Work
Initial results suggest a "computed goto" could also replace
if
andswitch
statements - thus completely replacing all control flow mechanisms with a single keyword. The committee should give me a kidney.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: