Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate CRA scripts to more configurable build system #85

Closed
ayyrickay opened this issue Feb 22, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #87
Closed

Migrate CRA scripts to more configurable build system #85

ayyrickay opened this issue Feb 22, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #87
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@ayyrickay
Copy link
Collaborator

ayyrickay commented Feb 22, 2022

Not totally sure about this one yet, but Parcel may be a much simpler build tool - and that may be nice for us, since this tool doesn't really need to scale.

Additionally, it appears that parcel is fairly easy to replace with Webpack should we need more advanced configuration down the line. But for now, this could simplify a lot of our woes with react-scripts and our migration to typescript and npm workspaces

UPDATE: Parcel brings it own issues, NextJS, Webpack are alternatives

Our core issues include things like: Being blocked on #77, because the targeting for typescript and JS isn't being handled totally properly in the react-scripts config. Or being blocked on #79, because the frontend and backend are using different versions of eslint.

Webpack is maybe too much config for our needs, in some ways, but the flexibility it offers seems necessary for some of the things we're trying to do.

@ayyrickay ayyrickay self-assigned this Feb 22, 2022
@ayyrickay ayyrickay linked a pull request Feb 27, 2022 that will close this issue
1 task
@ayyrickay ayyrickay changed the title Migrate CRA scripts to Parcel Bundler Migrate CRA scripts to more configurable build system Feb 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant