Fix/usersync update role

[mattgarvin1]

Problem: previously the usersync job would fail to modify existing roles in Arborist -this is because the Arborist API didn't have a PUT /role/{roleID} endpoint

Solution: this PR solves this problem by having Fence hit the newly implemented PUT /role/{roleID} Arborist endpoint

Note: this is a non-destructive code change in that the new usersync logic is:

• try to overwrite role by hitting the new Arborist endpoint
• if role overwrite doesn't work (because an older version of Arborist is deployed which does not have the new PUT /role/{roleID} endpoint), go to the pre-existing logic flow, which results in creating new roles that don't already exist in Arborist but does NOT result in modifying existing roles

That is to say - ideally in a given environment Fence and Arborist would be updated to these latest versions simultaneously, BUT if for whatever reason that's not possible - it would not cause any errors to only update Fence with this new version without updating Arborist.

Similarly, it would not cause any errors to only update the Arborist deployment without updating Fence, because the only difference would be that now that Arborist deployment has a new API endpoint that simply doesn't get used anywhere.

Bug Fixes

• during usersync - update existing roles in Arborist by hitting the new PUT /role/{roleID} endpoint

[github-actions]

The style in this PR agrees with black. ✔️

This formatting comment was generated automatically by a script in uc-cdis/wool.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10514

• 1 of 9 (11.11%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-0.05%) to 69.535%

---

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
fence/sync/sync_users.py	1	9	11.11%

Totals
Change from base Build 10509:	-0.05%
Covered Lines:	5722
Relevant Lines:	8229

---

💛 - Coveralls

[lgtm-com]

This pull request introduces 1 alert when merging 4c25019 into 50ff568 - view on LGTM.com

new alerts:

• 1 for Except block handles 'BaseException'

[lgtm-com]

This pull request introduces 1 alert when merging f6bcb31 into ba0b1fc - view on LGTM.com

new alerts:

• 1 for Except block handles 'BaseException'

[lgtm-com]

This pull request introduces 1 alert when merging 76f4461 into 9826912 - view on LGTM.com

new alerts:

• 1 for Except block handles 'BaseException'

needs re-review after dep update.

[paulineribeyre]

lgtm