Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[BUG] fix forced https issue for local running #219

Open
srecinto opened this issue Jul 8, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

[BUG] fix forced https issue for local running #219

srecinto opened this issue Jul 8, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
@srecinto
Labels
needs-investigation Needs further investigation needs-review Needs further review type: feature New feature or request
Milestone
V1.1.0

Comments

@srecinto
Copy link
Contributor

srecinto commented Jul 8, 2020 •
edited by noinarisak
Loading

Describe the bug
The Zatan developed on c9 which automatically gets HTTPS serving Zartan. Devs who do not use c9 we do not have that functionality.
@srecinto srecinto self-assigned this Jul 8, 2020
@noinarisak noinarisak added the type: feature New feature or request label Jul 10, 2020
@noinarisak
Copy link
Contributor

noinarisak commented Jul 10, 2020 •
edited
Loading

A possible workaround without touching the code is to document how to serve localhost with https with mkcert.

Inspiration article.
https://dev.to/rhymes/really-easy-way-to-use-https-on-localhost-341m

https://github.com/FiloSottile/mkcert

IMO, https development should be defacto.

Update: Even better article related to Flask 🎉
https://woile.github.io/posts/local-https-development-in-python-with-mkcert/

@noinarisak noinarisak added needs-investigation Needs further investigation needs-review Needs further review labels Jul 15, 2020
@noinarisak noinarisak added this to the V1.1.0 milestone Jul 16, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@srecinto srecinto

Labels
needs-investigation Needs further investigation needs-review Needs further review type: feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
V1.1.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@noinarisak @srecinto