Replies: 7 comments 8 replies
-
This is because the Sentry integration is basically misusing the Sentry feedback functionality. Unfortunately, I don't think there's anything to improve it. Though, you could try to play around with your grouping rules in Sentry. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think the issue is that you don't provide a unique text to UserFeedback class. As far as I see they all NULL, thus Sentry groups them by that value, regardless of the description being provided in the feedback itself. As a fix you could generate and assign GUID there. Here is the method in @ueman , what do you think? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Solved. The thing is to add unique fingerprint to
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@ueman, when will you be able to publish this small, yet crucial for this package, fix? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@ueman We also face this issue. Can you publish it? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@ueman ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Sentry is currently working on new feedback functionalities. I don't plan to work on the current implementation in the feedback library until Sentry is done. After Sentry is done, I assume that feedback + Sentry will work much better together. See getsentry/sentry-dart#2230 and also getsentry/sentry-dart#1593 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
For some reason, I can have only 1 user feedback in Sentry. It actually shows multiple but under single user feedback. And it updates the title of the feedback to the most recent. This is super weird. So the most painful part is that if I resolve it, it resolves every feedback (cause it is 1 apparently). My blind guess is that every feedback sends with the same Id (but I am not sure).
Do you have any ideas on how to fix that?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions