We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I'm storing different logs in elasticsearch and i want to utilize the type-field to separate them so i can have different mappings for each logformat.
I already took care that the _type field is in the record, but this plugin ingnores that and uses the type_name param instead.
Would it be pssoible to first check if there already is a _type field in the record and use this instead of type_name?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Absolutely. We are doing already this for _id and _parent. You can do the same for _type. Pull request is welcomed.
_id
_parent
_type
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
I'm storing different logs in elasticsearch and i want to utilize the type-field to separate them so i can have different mappings for each logformat.
I already took care that the _type field is in the record, but this plugin ingnores that and uses the type_name param instead.
Would it be pssoible to first check if there already is a _type field in the record and use this instead of type_name?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: