Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider adding beurk-vagrant as submodule #65

Open
jagu-sayan opened this issue Sep 9, 2015 · 6 comments
Open

Consider adding beurk-vagrant as submodule #65

jagu-sayan opened this issue Sep 9, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@jagu-sayan
Copy link
Contributor

It maybe interesting to include beurk demo.

@jagu-sayan
Copy link
Contributor Author

I forgot one important detail, beurk is in beurk-vagrant as git submodule 😴

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 9, 2015

Haha. Can I close this then? 👍

@nil0x42
Copy link
Contributor

nil0x42 commented Sep 13, 2015

okay, i understand better now.
i think we cna close it but we need to talk about beurk-vagrant repository in the wiki

@nil0x42
Copy link
Contributor

nil0x42 commented Sep 13, 2015

i have no idea where we should add a reference to it in the wiki, @mzap i do need your help on this issue

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 15, 2015

So, how do we tackle this then? I won't touch the documentation until beuk-vagrant is fully integrated as a submodule here. Please keep us up to date on this matter.

@jagu-sayan
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will do a pull request on both beurk and beurk-vagrant. It's more logical to have beurk-vagrant in beurk.

@nil0x42 nil0x42 added this to the version 1.0 milestone Sep 25, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants