-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uport for Quorum blokchain #63
Comments
Thanks for asking.
We are building a multiplatform framework to allow you to manage Decentralized Identities and Verifiable Credentials. It is designed to work for end-user apps as well as enterprises/institutions. |
Thank you for reply Can you please clarify more how can I use the uport-credentials and what is its specificity. I searched somewhere and found that I could create an identity for any organization using uPort AppManager. If you can clarify these points, I will be very thankful. |
uport-credentials is a library that helps create and verify credentials exchanged in the uPort ecosystem. That being said, I strongly suggest checking out DAF, the framework I mentioned earlier, since that will be our main focus coming up. |
Thank you again for your clarification. |
It is not. This has several advantages:
Check out ethr-did, ethr-did-resolver and ethr-did-registry |
I'm developing a donation platform based on the blockchain. I need to identify the beneficiary that can be an institution, an association, a hospital, a retirement home, a person, etc.
I study the possibility to integrate the Uport in my platform to identify the beneficiary.
So I have some questions :
1/ My platform is based on the Quorum private blockchain. So, I wonder if I can integrate Uport as an identity management solution in the Quorum network and how?
2/ In Uport, the mobile app holds the user’s keys. When a beneficiary is a person it may be logic. But When it is an organization, I cannot imagine how an organization holds its identity with a mobile. Is there any exception for an organization that replaces the use of mobile?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: