Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release v0.3.0 #71

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 19, 2018
Merged

release v0.3.0 #71

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 19, 2018

Conversation

jameslamb
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR adds a few more tweaks for us to push v0.3.0 to CRAN! See the diff on NEWS.md for the highlights.

I think we've added significant enough changes in the two months since v0.2.0 that a new release is warranted. Most notably support for Elasticsearch 6.x!

I would like #70 to make it onto this release if possible. Other than that, don't think anything is holding us up and we should be able to push to CRAN by the end of the week.

@jameslamb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cc @staftermath check out all the new goodness!

@jameslamb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

oh weird this is failing with the same error that was reported in #58

hmmmmmmmm

@@ -166,9 +166,26 @@ futile.logger::flog.threshold(0)
expect_true(all(outDT[, doc_count > 0]))
})

# We have tests on static empty results, but this test will catch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

whoops looks like I included this in a rebase when I shouldn't have! This will just get fixed when we merge #70 and then I'll rebuild. Sorry for the confusion

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

like I accidentally committed the test but not the changes from #70 . I was just a fool in the way I did this...promise it will make sense when we merge that one

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
$(function() {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Whoa cool

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ha yeah! this just came with pkgdown::build_site on the newest version

Copy link
Collaborator

@austin3dickey austin3dickey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love it. Awesome job, thanks for all the work this release

@jameslamb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'd like #73 to make it out on this release as well, if it's not too controversial. Will update the NEWS.md and then try a CRAN submission once we merge that PR

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jun 12, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #71 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #71   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.93%   86.93%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines         643      643           
=======================================
  Hits          559      559           
  Misses         84       84

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8fdcd22...56d37b3. Read the comment docs.

@jameslamb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

just submitted this for approval to CRAN! Will update the cran-comments.md and merge this if / when we get accepted.

@jameslamb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

got accepted to CRAN. Merging this up!! Thanks @austin3dickey !

@jameslamb jameslamb merged commit a3f1593 into uptake:master Jun 19, 2018
@jameslamb jameslamb deleted the release/v0.3.0 branch June 23, 2018 18:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants