Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vere urth/mars restage (discussion issue) #184

Open
eamsden opened this issue Dec 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Vere urth/mars restage (discussion issue) #184

eamsden opened this issue Dec 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@eamsden
Copy link
Collaborator

eamsden commented Dec 16, 2023

Several integration issues between Vere and Ares would be solved by migrating both to the urth/mars protocol instead of the current king/serf protocol. In particular, Vere forgoes the serf protocol for many subcommands and simply directly loads the snapshot (as well as the event log.) Making all such subcommands the responsibility of mars would allow a cleaner separation between ares-mars and vere-mars than is possible between ares-serf and vere-serf.

@eamsden eamsden changed the title Vere urth/mars restage Vere urth/mars restage (discussion issue) Dec 16, 2023
@matthew-levan matthew-levan added the enhancement New feature or request label May 26, 2024
@matthew-levan matthew-levan added this to the Vere compatibility milestone May 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants