You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@mpetersen-usgs For the 2014 NSHM, the Somerville (2001) magnitude scaling relation was adopted for gridded/smoothed seismicity sources (point-source distance corrections). What was the justification for doing so while not using this relation also for floating fault ruptures and RLME's?
(Note that only the Charlevoix RLME has an unknown strike and uses WC-length)
Also noted by @treyapel and @nileshshome
@mpetersen-usgs For the 2014 NSHM, the Somerville (2001) magnitude scaling relation was adopted for gridded/smoothed seismicity sources (point-source distance corrections). What was the justification for doing so while not using this relation also for floating fault ruptures and RLME's?
(Note that only the Charlevoix RLME has an unknown strike and uses WC-length)
cc: @olboyd-usgs @cmueller-usgs @mmoschetti-usgs @haller-usgs @srezaeian-usgs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: