Is -type suffix useful?

[harold-owen]

Most of the values end with "-type" while others do not. Is this intentional? Necessary? To me it just makes the documents and graph) more verbose. For example, instead of "Attack Theater Type", why not "Attack Theater"?

Values with Type: attack-theater-type, context-type, engineering-method-type, entity-role-type, impact-method-type, location-type, logical-impact-type, physical-impact-type, privilege-level-type, race-condition-type, sector-of-interest-type, vulnerability-type

Values without Type: criticality, known-chain, scope

If we keep the "-type" suffix, then maybe the folder should be renamed to "types".

In criticality.md, the heading is "Criticality Type Values".

In known-chain.md, the heading is "Known Chain Value".

In scope.md, the heading is actually "Scope Type Values".

[david-waltermire]

I think the "-type" suffix is not useful. This should be removed and the links should be updated. This can be done in the same editorial pass through the content as #4.