Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Relationship lines in Key of vulntology-graph.pdf #9

Closed
harold-owen opened this issue Aug 1, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Relationship lines in Key of vulntology-graph.pdf #9

harold-owen opened this issue Aug 1, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
@Chris-Turner-NIST
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@harold-owen
Copy link
Collaborator

harold-owen commented Aug 1, 2018 •
edited

The key in the upper left corner of vulntology-graph.pdf has four (4) lines labeled "Property". In reality they represent relationships, not properties, and should be differentiated as zero to many, one and only one, one or many, and many.
@harold-owen harold-owen added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 1, 2018
@harold-owen harold-owen mentioned this issue Aug 2, 2018
Closed
@david-waltermire
Copy link
Collaborator

Agree. The keys need to be clarified with respect to properties and relationships (see #15), along with the cardinalities.

@david-waltermire david-waltermire added this to the 0.5 M1 Initial Public Discussion Draft Release milestone Aug 2, 2018
Chris-Turner-NIST added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 31, 2018
@Chris-Turner-NIST
Major modifications to the vuln graph to handle clearer representatio…
a845d08 
…ns of type/subtype/values/properties. Also added changes to handle issues #3, #15, #9, #16 and #14
@Chris-Turner-NIST
Copy link
Collaborator

Changed the legend

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Chris-Turner-NIST Chris-Turner-NIST

Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@david-waltermire @harold-owen @Chris-Turner-NIST