Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

generally-avialable opam package #55

Open
vzaliva opened this issue Jan 6, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

generally-avialable opam package #55

vzaliva opened this issue Jan 6, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@vzaliva
Copy link
Contributor

vzaliva commented Jan 6, 2020

Currently, it requires using https://coq.inria.fr/opam/extra-dev which holds some
other experimental code I do not want to use. Would it be possible to make
it available via the default coq opam repository?

@palmskog
Copy link
Collaborator

palmskog commented Jan 9, 2020

Thanks for the interest. The main problem is that making releases takes additional continuous work for which there isn't any time budget right now. One workaround is to directly pin the package based on the repository URL. I aim to ensure the repository opam file always works.

When dune support for Coq stabilizes (hopefully mid-2020, but possibly earlier), we will use dune-release to automate releases.

@vzaliva
Copy link
Contributor Author

vzaliva commented Jan 11, 2020

Sorry to hear that. I was hoping that his package should be relatively low-maintenance as it includes only tactics, and already packaged in opam.

I did not know it is possible to pin a single package from a repository. I was afraid if I add extra-dev to my opam, an opam update/upgrade will install other experimental versions of packages I am using. How can I pin just one package from that repo?

@palmskog
Copy link
Collaborator

Here is what I meant you can do, which doesn't add any new opam repository:

opam pin add coq-struct-tact https://github.com/uwplse/StructTact.git -k git

This will use the package definition that is in the git repo on GitHub.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants