Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Benchmark custom HashMap vs. fastutil #38

Open
pstutz opened this issue Sep 30, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

Benchmark custom HashMap vs. fastutil #38

pstutz opened this issue Sep 30, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@pstutz
Copy link
Member

pstutz commented Sep 30, 2015

fastutil int->Object map seems to perform well: http://java-performance.info/hashmap-overview-jdk-fastutil-goldman-sachs-hppc-koloboke-trove-january-2015/

most likely the long->Object map required for triplerush would have good performance characteristics as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant