Added workaround for --isolatedModules inside of configuration files #39004
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
titusdmoore
requested review from
timneutkens,
ijjk,
shuding,
leerob,
steven-tey and
balazsorban44
as code owners
balazsorban44
approved these changes
Jul 26, 2022
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This relates to a bug from issue #38957 found inside of the
with-cypressexample as a result of the recent typescript conversion. This issue can be resolved with addingexport {};which prevents TypeScript from reading.tsconfiguration files from being read as legacy script files. This issue has been resolved on StackOverflow here. More info on--isolatedModulescan be read here.Bug
fixes #numbercontributing.mdFixes #38597