Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: unbreak turborepo_2 #8183

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 21, 2024
Merged

Conversation

chris-olszewski
Copy link
Member

Description

#8180 and #8157 ended up landing in a way where globs.t will fail due to using a test fixture that uses the now removed pipeline field.

Testing Instructions

CI

Copy link

vercel bot commented May 21, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
examples-nonmonorepo ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 21, 2024 5:33am
9 Ignored Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
examples-basic-web ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) May 21, 2024 5:33am
examples-designsystem-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) May 21, 2024 5:33am
examples-gatsby-web ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) May 21, 2024 5:33am
examples-kitchensink-blog ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) May 21, 2024 5:33am
examples-native-web ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) May 21, 2024 5:33am
examples-svelte-web ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) May 21, 2024 5:33am
examples-tailwind-web ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) May 21, 2024 5:33am
examples-vite-web ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) May 21, 2024 5:33am
rust-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) May 21, 2024 5:33am

Copy link
Contributor

🟢 Turbopack Benchmark CI successful 🟢

Thanks

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 21, 2024

🟢 CI successful 🟢

Thanks

@tknickman tknickman merged commit bade972 into turborepo_2 May 21, 2024
53 checks passed
@tknickman tknickman deleted the olszewski/chore_fix_turborepo_2 branch May 21, 2024 13:09
chris-olszewski added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
### Description

#8180 and #8157 ended up landing in a way where `globs.t` will fail due
to using a test fixture that uses the now removed `pipeline` field.

### Testing Instructions

CI
chris-olszewski added a commit that referenced this pull request May 28, 2024
### Description

#8180 and #8157 ended up landing in a way where `globs.t` will fail due
to using a test fixture that uses the now removed `pipeline` field.

### Testing Instructions

CI
chris-olszewski added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2024
### Description

#8180 and #8157 ended up landing in a way where `globs.t` will fail due
to using a test fixture that uses the now removed `pipeline` field.

### Testing Instructions

CI
chris-olszewski added a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2024
### Description

#8180 and #8157 ended up landing in a way where `globs.t` will fail due
to using a test fixture that uses the now removed `pipeline` field.

### Testing Instructions

CI
chris-olszewski added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2024
### Description

#8180 and #8157 ended up landing in a way where `globs.t` will fail due
to using a test fixture that uses the now removed `pipeline` field.

### Testing Instructions

CI
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants