Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

drop index through compact #1776

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2020
Merged

drop index through compact #1776

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2020

Conversation

bright-starry-sky
Copy link
Contributor

@bright-starry-sky bright-starry-sky commented Feb 14, 2020

When DROP INDEX command is complete, At this time, only the metadata of index was removed.
Then, index data needs to be deleted through the compact in storage layer.

Copy link
Contributor

@dangleptr dangleptr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Well done.

@panda-sheep
Copy link
Contributor

Excellent!

@dangleptr
Copy link
Contributor

Please check the failed UT . @bright-starry-sky

@bright-starry-sky
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please check the failed UT . @bright-starry-sky

Yes, I'm checking now , asyncMultiPut error leads the test case failing.

@bright-starry-sky
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please check the failed UT . @bright-starry-sky

Yes, I'm checking now , asyncMultiPut error leads the test case failing.

It is unrelated with this PR. This is an unstable testcase. I will improve this failing case at later.

@dangleptr dangleptr merged commit 1f02405 into vesoft-inc:master Feb 14, 2020
@bright-starry-sky bright-starry-sky deleted the drop_index_compact branch February 27, 2020 06:16
tong-hao pushed a commit to tong-hao/nebula that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2021
Co-authored-by: dangleptr <37216992+dangleptr@users.noreply.github.com>
yixinglu pushed a commit to yixinglu/nebula that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2023
<!--
Thanks for your contribution!
In order to review PR more efficiently, please add information according to the template.
-->

## What type of PR is this?
- [ ] bug
- [ ] feature
- [x] enhancement

## What problem(s) does this PR solve?
#### Issue(s) number: 

#### Description:
1. Reorganize the directory structure of the listener to facilitate the enterprise version to add other types of listeners.
2. remove unused variable.

## How do you solve it?



## Special notes for your reviewer, ex. impact of this fix, design document, etc:



## Checklist:
Tests:
- [ ] Unit test(positive and negative cases)
- [ ] Function test
- [ ] Performance test
- [ ] N/A

Affects:
- [ ] Documentation affected (Please add the label if documentation needs to be modified.)
- [ ] Incompatibility (If it breaks the compatibility, please describe it and add the label.)
- [ ] If it's needed to cherry-pick (If cherry-pick to some branches is required, please label the destination version(s).)
- [ ] Performance impacted: Consumes more CPU/Memory


## Release notes:

Please confirm whether to be reflected in release notes and how to describe:
> ex. Fixed the bug .....


Migrated from vesoft-inc#4953

Co-authored-by: panda-sheep <59197347+panda-sheep@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-for-testing PR: ready for the CI test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants