You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Decide on the best way to handle the user given sequence of tuples storing upper and lower bounds for parameters. If the user hands such a sequence (s.len > 0 checked), we need a way for the user to hand only a single bound on one parameter.
Previously one needed to hand (-Inf, Inf) as a tuple for these parameters. Now we interpret all bounds as unbound, if upper value equals lower.
This however disallows fixing a parameter to a certain value.
Find a good solution?!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Decide on the best way to handle the user given sequence of tuples storing upper and lower bounds for parameters. If the user hands such a sequence (
s.len > 0
checked), we need a way for the user to hand only a single bound on one parameter.Previously one needed to hand
(-Inf, Inf)
as a tuple for these parameters. Now we interpret all bounds as unbound, if upper value equals lower.This however disallows fixing a parameter to a certain value.
Find a good solution?!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: