Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VStack should expose SC's getMembers() #34

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Apr 22, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

VStack should expose SC's getMembers() #34

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Apr 22, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Create a VStack and add some members using addMember(...)
2. Get the list of members using getMembers() (described in the SmartClient
API docs)

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
I expect to get back a list of the members of the stack but the method is
not implemented in SmartGWT.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
4 Dec 2008 nightly build of SmartGWT
GWT 1.5.3
Mac OS X 1.5.5

Original issue reported on code.google.com by jhar...@gmail.com on 5 Dec 2008 at 7:24

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

The missing method getMembers() should be added to Layout (where it exists in
SmartClient). A convenience method such as getNumMembers() would be nice, too.

Without one of these methods it is impossible to iterate over the members of a 
Layout.

Original comment by gaheris@gmail.com on 7 Dec 2008 at 8:31

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by sanjiv.j...@gmail.com on 7 Dec 2008 at 8:52

  • Changed state: Accepted

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Added getMembers() method to build 12-17-2008.

Original comment by sanjiv.j...@gmail.com on 17 Dec 2008 at 12:18

  • Changed state: Fixed
  • Added labels: 12-17-2008, Type-Enhancement
  • Removed labels: Type-Defect

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant