Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparing celltypes from multiple samples. #3

Open
AidenSb opened this issue Oct 19, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Comparing celltypes from multiple samples. #3

AidenSb opened this issue Oct 19, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@AidenSb
Copy link

AidenSb commented Oct 19, 2021

Hi Vivian,
I'm trying to compare two celltypes. but reads are coming from multiple samples. do you suggest I extract the cells from each sample to a single bam file or multiple bam files?
to clarify I have ~1000 cells from 4 samples. I can extract celltypes A and B from these 4 Bam files and end up with 4 Cell A bam files and 4 Cell B bam files. then I can input these bam files to the bam_c1 and 2.
Alternatively, I can merge these bam files to one bam file and end up with one bam file per cell type. Which one is preferred for the MAPPER analysis or it doesn't matter?

@Vivianstats
Copy link
Owner

Hi Aiden,

I would suggest to prepare 4 bam files for celltype A and 4 bam files for celltype B, and input them as bam_c1 and bam_c2.
When you have 4 samples, this may not make a big difference; however, when you have more samples and paired test is desired, such input is required by MAAPER to produce the right results.

Best,
Vivian

@AidenSb
Copy link
Author

AidenSb commented Oct 19, 2021

Hi Vivian,
Thanks for the explanation, Indeed I have way more than 4 samples! one experiment has up to 20 samples ( control) and the other has like 10(treatment). So just to make sure if I understood correctly do you suggest to merge these to one big bam file? or proceed with multiple bams per condition?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants