Package Request: GCC 9.1

[Jackojc]

Just wondering if there is any plan or progress on GCC 9.1.

[pullmoll]

I'm currently testing bootstrapping with gcc-9.1.0. I'll push the updated packages onto my fork's master branch as soon as the base system and cross compilers are built:

• bootstrap
• base-voidstrap
• base-devel
• base-system
• cross-aarch64-linux-gnu + base-chroot for aarch64
• cross-aarch64-linux-musl + base-chroot for aarch64-musl
• cross-arm-linux-gnueabi
• cross-arm-linux-gnueabihf
• cross-arm-linux-musleabi
• cross-arm-linux-musleabihf
• cross-armv7l-linux-gnueabihf
• cross-armv7l-linux-musleabihf
• cross-i686-linux-musl + base-chroot for i686-musl
• cross-i686-pc-linux-gnu + base-chroot for i686
• cross-mips-linux-musl
• cross-mips-linux-muslhf
• cross-mipsel-linux-musl
• cross-mipsel-linux-muslhf
• cross-powerpc-linux-gnu
• cross-powerpc-linux-musl
• cross-powerpc64-linux-gnu
• cross-powerpc64-linux-musl
• cross-powerpc64le-linux-gnu
• cross-powerpc64le-linux-musl
• cross-vpkg-dummy
• cross-x86_64-linux-musl + base-chroot for x86_64-musl
• cross-x86_64-w64-mingw32
• gcc-multilib
• cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc

My temporary repository with gcc-9.1.0 packages.

[Gottox]

Sidenote: Currently theres a corruption issue with bcache and newer linux kernels.

[pullmoll]

@Gottox that is certainly a show stopper.

I'm currently looking at how to reinstatiate a part of the former patch musl-ada.patch which is missing. The cross-*musl* compilers cannot build gcc-9.1.0 because of an unresolved symbol getpt(3)...
Going to use posix_openpt(3) for all architectures, which also is what getpt(3) recommends.
Rebuild from scratch one more time.

[pullmoll]

For those who want to do some testing, specifically the bcache corruption issue, you can use unsigned https://repo.voidlinux.de/gcc91/ packages to create a live ISO and test it.

[pullmoll]

I tried to enable the D language with the update and I added some new subpackages to gcc:

• gcc-gdc contains /usr/bin/gdc the GNU D compiler
• libgd contains /usr/lib/libgdruntime.so.76.3.0 and symlink /usr/lib/libgdruntime.so.76
• libdg-devel contains /usr/lib/libgdruntime.{so,a} and /usr/lib/gcc/<triplet>/<ver>/include/d/*
• libgphobos contains /usr/lib/libgphobos.so.76.0.3, symlink /usr/lib/libgphobos.so.76, and /usr/lib/libgphobos.spec
• libgphobos-devel contains /usr/lib/libgphobos.{so,a}

I'll also add gdmd as a new package to my fork.
The idea is it should then be pssible to bootstrap dmd with the help of gdmd.

[pullmoll]

I just read Linux 5.1.12 fixed two bugs in bcache. I'll be testing if bcache works now in the next days.

[pullmoll]

Good news: the bcache bugs seem to be solved with linux4.19-4.19.53_1. I could create and use bcache devices with btrfs and subvolumes without problems.

I'll create two live ISOs for x86_64 for testers to run in a VM or on bare hardware. I'll upload them to my gcc91 repo's live directory.

It would also be interesting to have people test a mixture of packages from our main repo and (some) packages built with gcc-9.1.0, installed from https://repo.voidlinux.de/gcc91/, to see if and how well especially packages linking against libstdc++ play together.

[Jackojc]

Awesome, thanks @pullmoll !