Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Master 28/06/2024 #32

Merged
merged 23 commits into from
Jun 28, 2024
Merged

Master 28/06/2024 #32

merged 23 commits into from
Jun 28, 2024

Conversation

voltgizerz
Copy link
Owner

@voltgizerz voltgizerz commented Jun 28, 2024

Description

Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Test A
  • Test B

Test Configuration:

  • Firmware version:
  • Hardware:
  • Toolchain:
  • SDK:

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced language server configuration settings for enhanced code review automation.
    • Implemented GitHub Actions workflow for PR size labeling.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Fixed JWT token verification and request context handling for improved authentication.
    • Corrected configuration paths and environment variables for build processes.
  • Documentation

    • Updated README with latest requirements and detailed setup instructions.
  • Refactor

    • Renamed UserService to AuthService and associated handlers for better clarity.
    • Updated response structures to include RequestID and improve error/success messaging.
  • Tests

    • Added comprehensive tests for database initialization, API routes, and service methods.

@voltgizerz voltgizerz changed the title Master 29/06/2024 Master 28/06/2024 Jun 28, 2024
@voltgizerz voltgizerz added root Application root changes cmd Application command changes internal Application internal changes workflows Workflows updated docs Documentation changes mocks File mocks updated labels Jun 28, 2024
Copy link

This PR exceeds the recommended size of 1000 lines. Please make sure you are NOT addressing multiple issues with one PR. Note this PR might be rejected due to its size.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 28, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@voltgizerz has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 32 minutes and 0 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0ce5b61 and 1e175ec.

Walkthrough

The recent changes involve substantial updates ranging from configuration refinements to broad modifications in the codebase including file renaming, function updates, middleware additions, and new testing setups. Key components such as services and handlers experienced refactoring, enhancing the authentication flow. Various configuration files were updated to streamline the build processes, testing, and GitHub Actions workflows. MIT License was added, and the README received significant revisions for better clarity and alignment with the project updates.

Changes

Files/Paths Change Summaries
.air.toml Updated build command to specifically target main.go for refined build process.
.coderabbit.yaml Introduced language server configuration settings including language, review preferences, and chat automation options.
.github/workflows/code-checker.yml Increased TESTCOVERAGE_THRESHOLD from 10 to 20 and updated the Revive Action config path.
.github/workflows/pr-size-labeler.yml Added new GitHub Actions workflow for labeling pull requests based on their size.
LICENSE.md Added standard MIT License text with copyright information and permissions.
Makefile Modified down target to use reset command for mysql using goose.
README.md Renamed project, specified Go version 1.21.3, added Goose, and detailed database setup and migrations instructions.
cmd/main.go Refactored UserService to AuthService and UserHandler to AuthHandler, affecting initialization and control flow.
database/database.go Added sqlxConnectContext for sqlx.ConnectContext use in connectMySQL function.
database/database_test.go Introduced tests for database initialization with specific configurations and expectation verifications.
docs/api/Insomnia_2024-06-25.json Added Insomnia workspace with requests for user login, registration, menu creation, retrieval, update, and deletion under auth and menu groups.
go.mod Added new dependencies including github.com/bytedance/sonic, github.com/google/uuid, and others.
internal/app/api/handler/... Various handlers updated, refactoring and parameter adjustments, majorly shifting from User to Auth services and enhancing response structures.
internal/app/api/init_test.go Added test setup logic including object and environment variable initialization for API testing.
internal/app/api/middleware/... Added Initialization middleware for unique request ID generation and context modifications; JWTAuth middleware updated for token handling and user context adjustments.
internal/app/api/router.go Updated Fiber app initialization with Sonic JSON encoder/decoder, logger middleware additions, and route initialization refinements.
internal/app/api/server_test.go Added tests for server instance creation using interactor and JWT middleware.
internal/app/auth/auth.go Introduced Auth struct and function to retrieve user login details from context.
internal/app/entity/menu_entity.go Renamed MenuOrm struct to MenuORM.
internal/app/service/... Refactored UserService struct to AuthService, including corresponding field and function name updates in auth_service_test.go, and adjustments in mock objects in init_test.go.
internal/app/ports/menu_ports.go, init_test.go Updated parameter and type names related to menu handling in interface methods for better clarity and consistency.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant AuthHandler
    participant AuthService
    participant DB
    
    Client->>AuthHandler: POST /login
    AuthHandler->>AuthService: Login()
    AuthService->>DB: Verify user
    DB-->>AuthService: User verified
    AuthService-->>AuthHandler: Token generated
    AuthHandler-->>Client: Token

    Client->>AuthHandler: POST /register
    AuthHandler->>AuthService: Register()
    AuthService->>DB: Save user
    DB-->>AuthService: User saved
    AuthService-->>AuthHandler: User registered
    AuthHandler-->>Client: Registration success
Loading

Poem

In the land of code so fine,
Changes sparkled, intertwined.
AuthService rose, a star anew,
Middlewares grew, like morning dew.
Tests and routes aligned with care,
CodeRabbit's joy shines everywhere!
🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

✅ Test coverage is above the threshold. Good job!

  • Coverage: 24.8%, Threshold: 20%

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 17

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
internal/app/api/middleware/jwt_auth.go (1)

Line range hint 77-77: Clarify function return types for better readability.

Consider using named return types in the function signature to avoid confusion, especially when multiple values of the same type are returned.

- func parseAuthHeader(authHeader string) (string, string, error) {
+ func parseAuthHeader(authHeader string) (tokenType string, tokenValue string, err error) {
cmd/main.go (1)

Line range hint 102-102: Avoid shadowing import names.

The variable name interactor shadows an import name, which can lead to confusion and errors in larger codebases. Consider renaming the variable.

- interactorAPI := interactor.APInteractor{
+ apiInteractor := interactor.APInteractor{
internal/app/repository/menu_repository.go (1)

Line range hint 16-19: Correct the naming of SQL constants for consistency.

The naming convention for constants representing SQL queries should be consistent. The correct format is queryUpdateMenuByMenuID instead of queryUpdateMenuByMenuId.

- const queryUpdateMenuByMenuId = `UPDATE food_menus set is_active = 0 , deleted_at = ? where id = ?`
+ const queryUpdateMenuByMenuID = `UPDATE food_menus set is_active = 0 , deleted_at = ? where id = ?`
Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5e06fa8 and 8819f97.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (45)
  • .air.toml (1 hunks)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/code-checker.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/pr-size-labeler.yml (1 hunks)
  • LICENSE.md (1 hunks)
  • Makefile (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • cmd/main.go (2 hunks)
  • database/database.go (2 hunks)
  • database/database_test.go (1 hunks)
  • docs/api/Insomnia_2024-06-25.json (1 hunks)
  • go.mod (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/api/handler/auth_handler.go (4 hunks)
  • internal/app/api/handler/auth_handler_test.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/api/handler/init_test.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/api/handler/menu_handler.go (5 hunks)
  • internal/app/api/handler/response.go (2 hunks)
  • internal/app/api/init_test.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/api/middleware/initialization.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/api/middleware/jwt_auth.go (2 hunks)
  • internal/app/api/router.go (3 hunks)
  • internal/app/api/router_test.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/api/server_test.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/auth/auth.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/auth/jwt.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/constants/context.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/entity/auth_entity.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/entity/menu_entity.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/entity/user_entity.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/interactor/interactor.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/mocks/mocks_auth.go (3 hunks)
  • internal/app/mocks/mocks_menu.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/mocks/mocks_user.go (2 hunks)
  • internal/app/ports/auth_ports.go (2 hunks)
  • internal/app/ports/menu_ports.go (2 hunks)
  • internal/app/ports/user_ports.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/repository/menu_repository.go (4 hunks)
  • internal/app/repository/user_repository.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/repository/user_repository_test.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/service/auth_service.go (3 hunks)
  • internal/app/service/auth_service_test.go (7 hunks)
  • internal/app/service/init_test.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/app/service/menu_service.go (2 hunks)
  • internal/utils/bcrypt.go (1 hunks)
  • internal/utils/validator.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
  • .air.toml
  • .coderabbit.yaml
  • .github/workflows/code-checker.yml
  • internal/app/entity/user_entity.go
  • internal/app/mocks/mocks_user.go
  • internal/app/ports/user_ports.go
  • internal/app/repository/user_repository_test.go
  • internal/utils/bcrypt.go
Additional context used
Markdownlint
README.md

1-1: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


4-4: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


21-21: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD031, blanks-around-fences)


23-23: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD031, blanks-around-fences)


28-28: null
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD031, blanks-around-fences)


5-5: null
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD032, blanks-around-lists)

LICENSE.md

21-21: null
Files should end with a single newline character

(MD047, single-trailing-newline)

GitHub Check: Lint and Test
internal/app/entity/menu_entity.go

[failure] 20-20:
struct field UserId should be UserID

database/database.go

[failure] 7-7:
a blank import should be only in a main or test package, or have a comment justifying it

internal/app/api/middleware/jwt_auth.go

[failure] 77-77:
unnamed results of the same type may be confusing, consider using named results

cmd/main.go

[failure] 102-102:
The name 'interactor' shadows an import name

internal/app/repository/menu_repository.go

[failure] 17-17:
const queryUpdateActiveBatchMenuByUserId should be queryUpdateActiveBatchMenuByUserID


[failure] 16-16:
const queryGetMenuByUserId should be queryGetMenuByUserID


[failure] 19-19:
const queryUpdateMenuByMenuId should be queryUpdateMenuByMenuID


[failure] 18-18:
const queryUpdateMenuActiveByMenuId should be queryUpdateMenuActiveByMenuID


[failure] 117-117:
method FetchMenuById should be FetchMenuByID


[failure] 108-108:
var lastId should be lastID

golangci-lint
cmd/main.go

23-23: var wg is unused

(unused)

Gitleaks
docs/api/Insomnia_2024-06-25.json

1-1: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.

(jwt)


1-1: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.

(jwt)


1-1: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.

(jwt)


1-1: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.

(jwt)


1-1: Uncovered a JSON Web Token, which may lead to unauthorized access to web applications and sensitive user data.

(jwt)

Additional comments not posted (47)
internal/app/constants/context.go (1)

3-10: Addition of CTXKeyRequestID is beneficial.

The introduction of CTXKeyRequestID is a good practice for tracing requests across the application, enhancing debugging and logging capabilities.

internal/app/interactor/interactor.go (1)

14-24: Structural refactoring enhances modularity.

The introduction of AuthHandler, AuthService, and MenuHandler types enhances the separation of concerns and encapsulation within the application architecture.

internal/app/api/middleware/initialization.go (1)

11-25: Proper implementation of request ID initialization in middleware.

The middleware correctly handles the generation and propagation of a request ID, which is crucial for effective logging and tracing of requests throughout the application lifecycle.

internal/app/api/router_test.go (1)

9-36: Well-structured test for authentication routing.

The test for initAuthRoutes is well-structured, using mock objects appropriately to isolate the test environment and verify the routing logic effectively.

internal/app/service/init_test.go (2)

21-22: Updated Mock Object Names

The renaming of MockAuthService to MockJWTService aligns with the broader refactoring in the codebase to better reflect the JWT functionality. Ensure that all references to these mocks are updated across the test suite.


29-33: Initialization of New Mock Object

The addition of mockJWTService and its inclusion in MockObject is a good practice, ensuring that JWT functionality is thoroughly testable.

internal/app/api/init_test.go (2)

21-22: Introduced Mock for Auth Handler

Adding a mock for AuthHandler is crucial for isolating unit tests and ensuring they do not depend on external services or the actual implementation of the auth handler.


29-33: Proper Mock Initialization

The setup of MockAuthHandler in the test environment is correctly implemented, promoting reliable and modular testing.

internal/app/ports/auth_ports.go (2)

11-12: Interface for JWT Authentication

The introduction of the IJWTAuth interface is a positive change, providing clear contracts for JWT operations which will help in maintaining a clean architecture.


22-25: Updated Authentication Service Interface

The IAuthService interface changes are crucial for reflecting more accurately the operations available in the authentication service.

internal/app/api/server_test.go (1)

11-34: Unit Test for Server Initialization

This test ensures that the server is initialized correctly with the necessary interactors and middleware. Using reflect.DeepEqual for comparing objects is appropriate here, ensuring that all properties are correctly set.

README.md (1)

1-3: Updated README with Detailed Setup Instructions

The README updates are comprehensive, providing clear instructions for setting up the environment, running migrations, and starting the application. However, there are some Markdown formatting issues that need to be addressed.

1a2
> 
4a6
> 
20a22
> 
23a25
> 
27a29
> 
5a7
> 

Please add blank lines as required by Markdownlint for proper formatting.

Also applies to: 5-9, 11-30

Tools
Markdownlint

1-1: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)

internal/app/api/handler/init_test.go (1)

23-24: LGTM!

The addition of MockJWTService and MockAuthService aligns with the refactoring from UserService to AuthService. Ensure that these mocks are utilized appropriately in the test suites.

Also applies to: 31-32, 36-36

Makefile (1)

35-35: Change in database management strategy approved.

The change from down to reset in the goose command is significant and should be carefully managed. Verify that this change aligns with the intended database management strategy and does not lead to unintended data loss.

.github/workflows/pr-size-labeler.yml (1)

1-28: New GitHub Actions workflow for PR size labeling approved.

This workflow will help manage PR sizes effectively. However, consider rephrasing the message for XL-sized PRs to be less discouraging while still conveying the importance of manageable PR sizes.

- Note this PR might be rejected due to its size.
+ Please consider splitting this PR if possible to facilitate easier review and quicker integration.
internal/app/entity/auth_entity.go (1)

5-34: New authentication-related entities approved.

The addition of LoginRequest, RegisterRequest, LoginResponse, and CreateTokenResponse entities is well-defined. Ensure that the validation rules applied are thoroughly tested to prevent security vulnerabilities.

internal/app/api/handler/response.go (1)

10-12: Refactor: Enhanced response structure with Success and RequestID.

The addition of Success and RequestID fields to both error and success responses is a positive change, increasing the consistency and traceability of API responses. Ensure that all client-side implementations are updated to handle these new fields.

Also applies to: 16-19

database/database.go (2)

15-17: Good practice: Introduce abstraction for sqlx.ConnectContext.

Introducing sqlxConnectContext is a good practice as it allows for easier mocking and testing of database connections. Ensure that this abstraction is utilized consistently across the codebase.


Line range hint 7-7: Justify or remove the blank import.

The blank import of the MySQL driver should be accompanied by a comment explaining its necessity, as per Go's best practices, especially to avoid confusion and maintain clarity.

+	_ "github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql" // MySQL driver used implicitly by sqlx
internal/app/ports/menu_ports.go (1)

10-10: Update and clarify interface definitions in menu_ports.go.

The changes in interface methods reflect updates in the application's functionality. Ensure that all implementations of these interfaces are updated accordingly to prevent runtime issues.

Also applies to: 21-22, 28-32

internal/app/auth/auth.go (1)

10-16: Enhance security and error handling in user context extraction.

The introduction of the Auth struct and its usage in GetUserLoginFromCtx is a crucial part of the authentication flow. Ensure that the error messages do not leak sensitive information and consider logging these errors for better traceability.

Also applies to: 18-54

internal/app/auth/jwt.go (1)

24-24: Ensure interface implementation is complete.

The NewAuthJWT function correctly initializes an AuthJWT instance. Ensure that all interface methods required by ports.IJWTAuth are implemented.

internal/app/api/router.go (1)

13-17: Review the integration of Sonic JSON handlers.

The integration of sonic.Marshal and sonic.Unmarshal for JSON operations is a good performance optimization. Ensure that all data structures used in the application are compatible with Sonic's serialization requirements.

go.mod (1)

8-9: Review the dependency updates.

The addition of new dependencies such as github.com/bytedance/sonic and updates to existing ones are noted. Ensure that all new dependencies are compatible with the project's existing codebase and do not introduce licensing issues.

Also applies to: 14-18, 26-28, 34-41, 46-46

internal/app/repository/user_repository.go (1)

62-62: Ensure parameterized queries are used to prevent SQL injection.

The use of ExecContext with parameters is a good practice as it helps prevent SQL injection. Ensure that all dynamic inputs are parameterized throughout the codebase.

internal/app/api/middleware/jwt_auth.go (2)

8-8: Consider the implications of adding new imports.

The addition of the uuid library is justified for generating unique request IDs, which can enhance traceability in logs and debugging.


34-72: Review the JWT token validation and context manipulation logic.

Ensure the JWT token is properly validated and the user context is securely handled. It's crucial that the token parsing and validation are secure against common exploits like token forgery.

Verification successful

JWT Token Validation and Context Manipulation Logic Verified

The VerifyToken method securely handles JWT token parsing and validation. It uses a secret key, checks for token validity, and includes appropriate error handling. The test cases cover various scenarios, ensuring robustness against potential exploits.

  • internal/app/auth/jwt.go (lines 60-82)
  • internal/app/auth/jwt_test.go (lines 54-97)
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the security of JWT token handling.

# Test: Search for `VerifyToken` usage. Expect: Secure practices in all occurrences.
rg --type go $'VerifyToken'

Length of output: 1815



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the implementation of VerifyToken
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (a *AuthJWT) VerifyToken(ctx context.Context, tokenString string) (*jwt.Token, jwt.MapClaims, error) { $$$ }'

# Extract the test cases for VerifyToken
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func TestAuthJWT_VerifyToken(t *testing.T) { $$$ }'

Length of output: 4072

cmd/main.go (2)

Line range hint 56-67: Review the service and handler initialization changes.

Ensure that the new AuthService and AuthHandler are correctly initialized with the appropriate dependencies. This is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the authentication process.


Line range hint 23-23: Remove unused variables to clean up the code.

The variable wg is declared but not used, which can lead to unnecessary clutter in the codebase.

- var wg sync.WaitGroup
internal/app/service/auth_service.go (3)

16-23: Review the structure of the AuthService class.

The changes to the AuthService structure are appropriate and align with the dependency inversion principle by injecting dependencies through the constructor.


28-57: Ensure robust error handling and logging in authentication methods.

Proper error handling and detailed logging are crucial for debugging and security in authentication processes. Ensure that all potential error paths are handled gracefully.


Line range hint 73-115: Review the registration logic for potential security improvements.

The registration process should ensure that the email is not already in use before proceeding. This helps prevent duplicate accounts and potential data inconsistencies.

internal/app/service/menu_service.go (2)

28-35: Review the menu registration logic for correctness and performance.

Ensure that the conversion from the domain model to the ORM model is correct and that the database interactions are optimized for performance.


111-111: Ensure proper error handling in menu update operations.

Proper error handling is crucial, especially in operations that affect the state of the database. Ensure that all potential error paths are handled gracefully.

internal/app/repository/menu_repository.go (1)

55-59: Review the use of time.Now() for setting deleted_at.

Using time.Now() directly in SQL queries can lead to different times being used if the query is called multiple times. Consider passing the time as a parameter to ensure consistency.

Also applies to: 77-77

internal/app/api/handler/menu_handler.go (4)

26-26: Ensure proper context usage in tracing.

The method AddMenu uses c.UserContext() for starting a span, which is correct. Ensure that all context manipulations are consistently using UserContext across all methods.


118-118: Check consistency in error messages.

The error message in UpdateActiveMenuBatchByUserID uses a format string but doesn't provide a variable. This could lead to confusion and should be corrected for clarity.

- return SendErrorResp(c, fiber.StatusBadRequest, fmt.Sprintf(constants.ErrMsgFailedDeleteMenu, " delete batch by user id"))
+ return SendErrorResp(c, fiber.StatusBadRequest, "Failed to delete menu batch by user id")

80-80: Incorrect span name in UpdateMenuByMenuID.

The span name in UpdateMenuByMenuID is incorrectly copied from another method. It should reflect the actual operation being performed.

- span, ctx := opentracing.StartSpanFromContext(c.UserContext(), "handler.MenuHandler.GetMenuByUserID")
+ span, ctx := opentracing.StartSpanFromContext(c.UserContext(), "handler.MenuHandler.UpdateMenuByMenuID")

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


62-62: Review parameter conversion in GetMenuByUserID.

Converting userID from string to integer could fail if the input is not properly validated. Ensure that there's an upstream validation or error handling to prevent runtime panics.

Verification successful

Validation for userID parameter conversion is present in GetMenuByUserID.

The userID parameter is converted from string to integer using strconv.Atoi, and there is error handling to return a bad request response if the conversion fails. This ensures that invalid userID values are properly managed.

  • Location: internal/app/api/handler/menu_handler.go, lines 67-70.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there's validation for `userID` parameter before it's passed to `GetMenuByUserID`.

# Test: Search for validation logic. Expect: Validation checks before the method call.
rg --type go "GetMenuByUserID" -C 10

Length of output: 7978

internal/app/mocks/mocks_auth.go (1)

46-46: Verify the correctness of mock implementations.

The mock methods for CreateToken and VerifyToken are correctly implemented. Ensure that these methods are used consistently in tests to simulate real interactions.

Also applies to: 55-55, 61-61, 71-71

internal/app/mocks/mocks_menu.go (7)

1-7: Generated Code Header

The header correctly indicates that this file is generated by MockGen and should not be edited manually. It also specifies the source file and the command used to generate the mocks.


21-42: Mock Structure for IMenuHandler

The mock structure for IMenuHandler is correctly set up with a controller and a recorder. This is standard practice for mocks generated using GoMock.


44-56: AddMenu Method Mock

The AddMenu method in the MockIMenuHandler is properly mocked. It includes helper method calls and error handling as expected. Ensure the parameters and return types align with the interface definition.


114-135: Mock Structure for IMenuService

Similar to IMenuHandler, the IMenuService mock is well-structured. It includes a controller, recorder, and methods that follow the expected pattern for mocks.


137-150: GetMenu Service Method Mock

The GetMenu service method is correctly mocked, including parameter and return type checks. This ensures that the mock will behave as expected during unit tests.


212-233: Mock Structure for IMenuRepository

The mock for IMenuRepository is set up correctly. It includes a controller and a recorder, which are essential for the mock's functionality and integration with GoMock.


235-248: AddMenu Repository Method Mock

The AddMenu method in the MockIMenuRepository is properly implemented with correct parameter handling and error simulation. This is crucial for testing error handling in the repository layer.

internal/utils/validator.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/api/Insomnia_2024-06-25.json Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/app/entity/menu_entity.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
LICENSE.md Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/app/api/handler/response.go Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/app/api/handler/auth_handler.go Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/app/api/handler/auth_handler_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/app/api/handler/auth_handler_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/app/service/auth_service_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/app/service/auth_service_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

This PR exceeds the recommended size of 1000 lines. Please make sure you are NOT addressing multiple issues with one PR. Note this PR might be rejected due to its size.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8819f97 and 0ce5b61.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • internal/app/entity/menu_entity.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • internal/app/entity/menu_entity.go

Copy link

This PR exceeds the recommended size of 1000 lines. Please make sure you are NOT addressing multiple issues with one PR. Note this PR might be rejected due to its size.

@voltgizerz voltgizerz merged commit c97ee67 into master Jun 28, 2024
4 checks passed
Copy link

✅ Test coverage is above the threshold. Good job!

  • Coverage: 24.8%, Threshold: 20%

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cmd Application command changes docs Documentation changes internal Application internal changes mocks File mocks updated root Application root changes size/xl workflows Workflows updated
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant