Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prettyhtml. Fix #561. Fix #491 #912

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 3, 2018
Merged

Prettyhtml. Fix #561. Fix #491 #912

merged 5 commits into from
Oct 3, 2018

Conversation

octref
Copy link
Member

@octref octref commented Sep 25, 2018

@StarpTech I ran it through a few real-world examples. Overall looking pretty good!

If you can handle Prettyhtml/prettyhtml#29 and Prettyhtml/prettyhtml#28 I believe it's good to go.

As for the options, I would suggest usePrettier -> formatEmbeddedContent. It's not a deal breaker for me but hope it can be more explicit.

Todos for myself:

  • Add unit tests
  • Add E2E tests using real-world examples

@StarpTech
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @octref I just released an overwhelmed version of prettyhtml. Please upgrade to the latest version. This includes a new parser which is less strict and much easier to maintain. The issues above should be already gone.

@octref octref mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2018
3 tasks
@octref octref merged commit 2005411 into master Oct 3, 2018
@octref octref mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2018
17 tasks
@octref octref deleted the prettyhtml branch October 5, 2018 18:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants