-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Include a new codec from EBSI implementation #63
Comments
Thank you @samu-gataca |
@samu-gataca fascinating approach... |
Hi there, any new about this topic? |
I'm opposed to this. It would make I.m.o., if you're handling JWKs, use |
Enhance did:key functionality to resolve [EBSI-style did:keys](https://hub.ebsi.eu/vc-framework/did/natural-person). They use the JWK_JCS-PUB multicodec. Relevant issues that are related to this PR: [w3c-ccg/did-method-key#63](w3c-ccg/did-method-key#63) [spruceid#536](spruceid#536) Re-do of former PR spruceid#545
Enhance did:key functionality to resolve [EBSI-style did:keys](https://hub.ebsi.eu/vc-framework/did/natural-person). They use the JWK_JCS-PUB multicodec. Relevant issues that are related to this PR: [w3c-ccg/did-method-key#63](w3c-ccg/did-method-key#63) [spruceid#536](spruceid#536) Re-do of former PR spruceid#545
Enhance did:key functionality to resolve [EBSI-style did:keys](https://hub.ebsi.eu/vc-framework/did/natural-person). They use the JWK_JCS-PUB multicodec. Relevant issues that are related to this PR: [w3c-ccg/did-method-key#63](w3c-ccg/did-method-key#63) [spruceid#536](spruceid#536) Re-do of former PR spruceid#545
Hi there,
I'm reaching out you to try to include the EBSI specification into the did key specification.
https://api-pilot.ebsi.eu/docs/specs/did-methods/did-method-for-natural-person#schema-of-the-method-specific-identifier
As you can see in the implementation, there is a multicodec approach
With this public key P-256
{ "crv": "P-256", "kty": "EC", "x": "Lyzu4hajYTyIBGeg31gneDkID1iiUapPONRPIrG8l4Y", "y": "iMLobYRurzjfgfJS-CbAPMA8xrVsA8QgQdimEu_W-yo" }
The DID generated is
did:key:z2dmzD81cgPx8Vki7JbuuMmFYrWPgYoytykUZ3eyqht1j9KbpaxuVPhKtEdpKCagY9XhyyyzNUPwwd4ookwVpAMkkMnKkNWWUJrSYPuShZp8dPKs17kBZqqfz3vDn3QQUT9EEiZN59AGSnDFxYLaRb2DawMkRhJth6U76FuKuWPZJE3v2G
In your specification there is the possibility to use this kind of codifications, so we are requesting to add this new one to the list included into the did method.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: