Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

What are the reasons that JSON-LD shouldn't be used for term extensibility in the VC API? #287

Closed
msporny opened this issue Apr 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

What are the reasons that JSON-LD shouldn't be used for term extensibility in the VC API? #287

msporny opened this issue Apr 19, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@msporny
Copy link
Contributor

msporny commented Apr 19, 2022 •
edited
Loading

This conversation started in issue #198 and the group wanted to have a discussion around what the reasons for not using JSON-LD for extensibility in the VC API were. This issue is to capture that discussion.
@msporny msporny mentioned this issue Jan 31, 2023
Open
@msporny
Copy link
Contributor Author

msporny commented Jan 31, 2023

Closing in favor of issue #335, which attempts to define the extensibility solution for input options to the VC API.

@msporny msporny closed this as completed Jan 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@msporny