You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My quick comment is on VRS. The current draft has:
REQ 9a: Provide or ensure support for video relay and remote interpretation services. This user need may relate to interoperability with third-party services; IETF has looked at standardizing a way to use Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) with VRS services. [ietf-relay] VRS calls may be made between ASL (American Sign Language) users and hearing persons speaking either English or Spanish.
Why do you limit VRS to ASL and English/Spanish? It may be applicable to the US, but it does not even cover North America, as Canada uses LSQ and French as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@nitedog This seems to be reflecting IETF phrasings but I agree that we should use just "sign language" in place of ASL or any other specific sign language.
Filed on behalf of Masahito Kawamori (ITU-T):
My quick comment is on VRS. The current draft has:
Why do you limit VRS to ASL and English/Spanish? It may be applicable to the US, but it does not even cover North America, as Canada uses LSQ and French as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: