Rewrite 2.3.5 section 2 on type sizes #208
Conversation
…ns are rendered correctly
index.html
Outdated
| <p data-lang="en">There are two traditional size systems for Chinese characters, an old one and a new one. The following tables shows the equivalence of the old size system and the new size system in the Western point system respectively.</p> | ||
| <table class="charsize" id="oldsize-en" data-lang="en"> | ||
| <p data-lang="en">There have been different size systems for Chinese characters. The size system in traditional metal type utilized hào (literally No. ) units, while in the phototypesetting era, <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/jlreq/#elements_of_kihonhanmen">Q</a> were used as the sizing units instead. When it came to desktop publishing, font sizes were determined by the DTP point system which was built into the software itself. Currently, the traditional hào-system are still used for typesetting in many Chinese publications.</p> | ||
| <p data-lang="en">These hào-system were not standardized by the various foundries in the past. In addition, point-systems were also different in Anglo-Americas, Europe Continental, DTP and so on, which resulted in numerous conversion methods between hào-system and point-system. The following table lists their most common corresponding conversions as a reference. It is not normative information.</p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Some more:
This hao system was ...
"Anglo-Americas, Europe Continental" sounds odd, but maybe those are technical terms. Seems like adjectives without a noun though ('systems'?).
hth
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, these 2 are technical terms, should be as adjectives, for the noun "point(s)".
And, there is a little typo, not "Anglo-Americas" but "Anglo-American"
I will fix it.
|
很抱歉，我又把两个issue的修正不小心合起来了 |
|
@huijing after discussion with Fuqiao this morning, I'm making some sweeping edits to the clreq source at the moment that will produce conflicts with your PRs. Could you hold off for a short while, while i complete them? I'll ping you when it's safe again. Cheers. |
|
@huijing i think i'm finished for now. To resolve the conflicts i think you just need to do the following: Everywhere you see |
|
@r12a sure thing. I'll run through and fix them. |
# Conflicts: # index.html
# Conflicts: # index.html
|
I've resolved the merge conflicts, I think I've caught all the |
|
@huijing the commit you just made appears to have conflict markup in it. Did you know? |
|
Ah, we crossed messages. But at https://github.com/w3c/clreq/pull/208/files i'm still seeing |
|
Ah, I missed it when I did a second merge with the clreq branch. I've resolved it now. |
|
LGTM. |
|
Merging. Thank you! 🎉 |
Preview | Diff