You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Firefox thinks so. In a way, this seems reasonable, since we're talking about out-of-flow. Then again, contained out-of-flow elements respect block fragmentation, and cloned box decorations sort of shrink the fragmentainer space available to descendants.
Cloned block edge box decorations aren't implemented by any others at the moment that I'm aware of (well, PrinceXML has it, but they don't fragment OOFs at all, it seems).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a good question... absolutely positioned boxes generally don't care what happens underneath them except to the extent it changes their containing block, so I think in your example it would overlap.
But for floats, I think they would run out of room while leaving enough room for the cloned box decorations.
Spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-break/#break-decoration
Are out-of-flow positioned elements expected to steer clear of cloned borders in the containing block chain, or should they just overlap?
Firefox thinks so. In a way, this seems reasonable, since we're talking about out-of-flow. Then again, contained out-of-flow elements respect block fragmentation, and cloned box decorations sort of shrink the fragmentainer space available to descendants.
Cloned block edge box decorations aren't implemented by any others at the moment that I'm aware of (well, PrinceXML has it, but they don't fragment OOFs at all, it seems).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: