Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What are the rules for string equality when column names are matched with annotations #578

Closed
iherman opened this issue Jun 2, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Jun 2, 2015

(Comment originally posted by Steven Atkin)

6.2 Example with single table and rich annotations
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-csv2json-20150416/#example-tree-ops-ext

When the names of the columns in the CSV data are compared with the names of the columns in the annotations what is the rule for determining if they are the same? For example, is equality based solely on the UTF-8 raw byte sequence or is some form of Unicode Normalization applied first and does case matter when making comparisons?

It is recommended that Unicode text not be normalized if it is already in a Unicode encoding. If text needs to be converted into Unicode, then a normalizing transcoder should be used and text be normalized into Unicode Normal Form C.

It is recommended that case sensitive matching be used when making comparisons.

@JeniT
Copy link

JeniT commented Jun 3, 2015

I believe this is partially fixed by #581 (namely around making the decoding into Unicode & normalization explicit), but also by the resolution #551 which defines the matching algorithm for column names/titles.

@JeniT
Copy link

JeniT commented Jun 10, 2015

@JeniT JeniT removed their assignment Jun 10, 2015
@JeniT JeniT added the Resolved label Jun 10, 2015
@JeniT JeniT closed this as completed Jun 10, 2015
@iherman
Copy link
Member Author

iherman commented Jun 11, 2015

Noting the positive reply from Steven.

@iherman iherman added the NonWG label Jul 9, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants