Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

DID Test Suite and untestable normative statements #44

Closed
brentzundel opened this issue Sep 23, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

DID Test Suite and untestable normative statements #44

brentzundel opened this issue Sep 23, 2019 · 4 comments
Assignees
@msporny
Labels
editorial Editors should update the spec then close pending close Issue will be closed shortly if no objections

Comments

@brentzundel
Copy link
Member

@kimdhamilton moved from CCG (w3c-ccg/did-spec#228)
@msporny
Copy link
Member

msporny commented Oct 1, 2019

I believe PR w3c-ccg/did-spec#210 addressed this issue. @rhiaro and @aljones15 can you please confirm?

@msporny msporny added the editorial Editors should update the spec then close label Oct 1, 2019
@rhiaro
Copy link
Member

rhiaro commented Oct 1, 2019

I think so, best effort for the time being at least.

@msporny msporny self-assigned this Oct 10, 2019
@msporny
Copy link
Member

msporny commented Nov 11, 2019 •
edited
Loading

This was resolved a while ago, closing in 7 days.

@msporny msporny added the pending close Issue will be closed shortly if no objections label Nov 11, 2019
@aljones15
Copy link
Contributor

aljones15 commented Nov 11, 2019 •
edited
Loading

This looks fine and the first release of the test suite is in master. So good work and thanks. Feel free to close.

@msporny msporny closed this as completed Dec 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@msporny msporny

Labels
editorial Editors should update the spec then close pending close Issue will be closed shortly if no objections
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@msporny @aljones15 @rhiaro @brentzundel