Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OWL serialization of DPV and extensions #42

Closed
Tracked by #50
pab-github opened this issue Jun 28, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed
Tracked by #50

OWL serialization of DPV and extensions #42

pab-github opened this issue Jun 28, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation review Review and close/update issue
Milestone

Comments

@pab-github
Copy link

Dear all, the reasoners for compliance checking expect the ontologies in owl format, which is related to Turtle and RDF but different. It would be helpful to add the OWL serialization to the others already present in the repository.

Functionally, all supported syntax would do (Manchester, functional, XML), but Manchester is the closest to RDF and Turtle, so it may be a preferred choice, as it may look more familiar to RDF and Turtle users.

@coolharsh55 coolharsh55 added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation review Review and close/update issue labels Jun 28, 2022
@coolharsh55
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks Piero. I've added code support in 1a9bb10 for exporting .owl files in Machester syntax (only) for DPV-OWL and extensions, e.g. see https://github.com/w3c/dpv/blob/master/dpv-owl/dpv.owl. I've created #43 to discuss additional axioms to be included within DPV-OWL - please also take a look there.

@coolharsh55 coolharsh55 added this to the DPV v1 milestone Jun 30, 2022
@coolharsh55
Copy link
Collaborator

@pab-github Hi, are there any followup points/actions for this discussion?

If there are no more actions for this discussion, I will mark it as resolved on OCT-15.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation review Review and close/update issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants