-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update to editorial notes and change notes in ttl file #926
Conversation
...now that ED has clarified properties ect
...in DCAT context
This should only get merged after #919 has been merged. Question: should the ttl file have an entry for |
My view is that we should mention every class and property that is 'recommended for use'. |
I agree with @dr-shorthair's point. |
Thanks - I've done that now (though since I don't have any support for ttl syntax someone should have a check....) I also think that this lines up with #919 (as it did before) but re-checking all the notes etc can perhaps wait till its time to merge this..... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did a syntax check.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
look ok
in line with #919... and #920.
Remove editorialNotes marking work in progress
Align change notes with the work in #919