Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Doesn't example 3 in text-underline-position break current UA behavior? #388

Closed
r12a opened this issue Apr 24, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

Doesn't example 3 in text-underline-position break current UA behavior? #388

r12a opened this issue Apr 24, 2017 · 4 comments
Labels
close? The related issue was closed by the Group but open here i:text_decoration Text decoration & other inline features s:css-text-decor https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor/ spec-type-issue Use for any WG issue with an ..lreq label. tracker i18n is following a discussion, but doesn't require resolution.

Comments

@r12a
Copy link
Contributor

r12a commented Apr 24, 2017

https://www.w3.org/Mail/flatten/index?subject=Doesn%27t+example+3+in+text-underline-position+break+current+UA+behavior&list=www-style
@r12a r12a added s:css-text-decor https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor/ pending Issue not yet sent to WG, or raised by tracker tool & needing labels. tracker i18n is following a discussion, but doesn't require resolution. labels Apr 24, 2017
@r12a
Copy link
Contributor Author

r12a commented Apr 24, 2017

CSS doc says: Open: Accepted =i18n= Evaluate whether defaulting omitted auto/under to auto is better than under.
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-18

@r12a r12a added hangul spec-type-issue Use for any WG issue with an ..lreq label. i:text_decoration Text decoration & other inline features labels Jul 24, 2017
@r12a
Copy link
Contributor Author

r12a commented Sep 25, 2017

Current status: This is quite complicated to piece together. It would be nice to have a summary of the final proposal, after agreement with the various parties in the discussion before we pass judgement.

@r12a r12a removed the pending Issue not yet sent to WG, or raised by tracker tool & needing labels. label Sep 28, 2017
@fantasai
Copy link

fantasai commented Feb 3, 2018

The request to i18n is to evaluate the decision of defaulting to auto rather than under

  • for CJKM in general, via UA style rules
  • for declarations which specify a position for vertical writing modes but not horizontal ones

@r12a
Copy link
Contributor Author

r12a commented Feb 12, 2018

Discussed during i18n telecon. Agreed to close.

@r12a r12a added the close? The related issue was closed by the Group but open here label Feb 12, 2018
@r12a r12a closed this as completed Feb 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
close? The related issue was closed by the Group but open here i:text_decoration Text decoration & other inline features s:css-text-decor https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor/ spec-type-issue Use for any WG issue with an ..lreq label. tracker i18n is following a discussion, but doesn't require resolution.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@fantasai @r12a