Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Do we need directional metadata in the first place ? #706

Closed
himorin opened this issue May 30, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Do we need directional metadata in the first place ? #706

himorin opened this issue May 30, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
needs-resolution i18n expects this item to be resolved to their satisfaction. s:rdf-dir-literal t:bidi_strings 3.5 Handling base direction for strings

Comments

@himorin
Copy link
Contributor

himorin commented May 30, 2019

This is a tracker issue. Only discuss things here if they are i18n WG internal meta-discussions about the issue. Contribute to the actual discussion at the following link:

§ w3c/rdf-dir-literal#7
On best practices for use cases of directional metadata
@r12a r12a added needs-resolution i18n expects this item to be resolved to their satisfaction. and removed i:bidi_text Bidirectional text labels May 31, 2019
@r12a
Copy link
Contributor

r12a commented Feb 21, 2020

The repository has been archived, and i believe the thread came to a useful conclusion, so i'm closing this.

@r12a r12a closed this as completed Feb 21, 2020
@r12a r12a added the t:bidi_strings 3.5 Handling base direction for strings label Aug 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
needs-resolution i18n expects this item to be resolved to their satisfaction. s:rdf-dir-literal t:bidi_strings 3.5 Handling base direction for strings
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@himorin @r12a