Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Push API > 2017-06-16 #104

Open
aphillips opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Push API > 2017-06-16 #104

aphillips opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
LC Working Draft approaching CR. REVIEW REQUESTED

Comments

@aphillips
Copy link
Contributor

aphillips commented May 3, 2017

https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+label%3As%3Apush-api+is%3Aopen+

https://www.w3.org/TR/push-api/

The WebPlat WG would welcome an internationalisation review of the Push API
specification [1]. We'd like to transition to CR in the coming months, and this
review will help us assess what remains to be done before then.

If you could file your comments as Github issues [2], before 16th June 2017, that
would be appreciated.

Any questions, you know where to find us - please just ask.

Thanks
Léonie
[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/push-api/
[2] https://github.com/w3c/push-api/

@LJWatson
Copy link

Ping for a possible ETA for this review? Thanks.

@aphillips
Copy link
Contributor Author

@LJWatson Thanks for your patience. We expect to complete our review by next week. Sorry for the delay.

@LJWatson
Copy link

Thanks @aphillips

We've had to push out the security/privacy review, so we have a bit more breathing space. If it helps to push the i18n review out by two/three weeks, that's no problem.

@r12a r12a transferred this issue from w3c/i18n-activity Dec 19, 2019
@r12a r12a added LC Working Draft approaching CR. REVIEW REQUESTED labels Dec 19, 2019
@aphillips aphillips self-assigned this Jan 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
LC Working Draft approaching CR. REVIEW REQUESTED
Projects
Status: Awaiting comment resolution
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants