CSS Color 4 > 2020-10-31

[svgeesus]

We have conducted a self-review of our spec CSS Color 4, and the results can be found at w3c/csswg-drafts#5034.

Please check our findings.

• Do you need a reply by a particular date?

Not really. The specification is firming up, but is not yet complete and is unlikely to get to CR for 6 months or more.

Other comments:

Honestly think there is nothing for you to review here. This specification is about making colors. That is all. But a quick glance would still be appreciated!

[xfq]

I have reviewed the spec and didn't found any:

• natural language text that would be read/searched by a user
• issues regarding character encoding
• markup elements/attributes
• local date/time/format

The named colors and system colors are ASCII case-insensitive, which look good to me.

We might need to add a note to the Transparency section about the glyph overlap issue (here's a test). We can discuss it in the next i18n teleconference.

[xfq]

Filed w3c/i18n-activity#910 , pending discussion by i18n WG.

[r12a]

NOTE: Please don't comment on the thread pointed to by @xfq. We will in due course send a comment your way.

[svgeesus]

Noting that this is now "Completed" and that the overlapping text opacity issue is now resolved and closed, should this issue still be open or can it be closed?

[aphillips]

@svgeesus This is in our radar as "completed". We review and close these periodically.