Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ittp:activeArea clarification #227

Closed
palemieux opened this issue May 9, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

ittp:activeArea clarification #227

palemieux opened this issue May 9, 2017 · 5 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@palemieux
Copy link
Contributor

From https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2017May/0018.html

It is understood that the purpose of the activeArea attribute is to
specify an area where nothing disturbs presentation of an element with
this attribute. However, it is unclear for us how to do it because
behavioral model of this attribute is not defined. The draft notes the
case in which video cropping involves cropping of captions. But
considering a case that the other object(s) are trying to overlap the
object with this attribute, a relation between the attribute and z-index
of CSS should come to an issue.

@palemieux palemieux added this to the imsc1.0.1 CR milestone May 9, 2017
@palemieux palemieux self-assigned this May 9, 2017
@palemieux
Copy link
Contributor Author

The behavioral model of this attribute is left unspecified on purpose. This attribute is similar to the AFD metadata commonly used in broadcast applications. AFD metadata does not dictate video decoder and display behavior. Instead, the latter can use the AFD metadata to choose a presentation mode, based on display shape and user preferences.

See discussion at #191

@andreastai
Copy link

I agree. The strategies how to make use of this piece of extra information was left unspecified on purpose.

@nigelmegitt
Copy link
Contributor

I also agree; maybe we need to be clearer in an informative note about why this is the case?

@palemieux
Copy link
Contributor Author

Informative note added by #231

@palemieux
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants