-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[simple-ruby] Normativeness #2
Comments
On the one hand, you're right. On the other hand, it seemed useful to me to distinguish between the body of the text that describes the logic, and pieces of commentary about it. The normative/non-normative distinction offered by respec (and implied in notes) seemed right for that. I could removed the informativeness statements in section 2 and 4, but the notes would remain "non-normative", and I think the reference section would therefore not be collapsed. |
It should be possible to retain a distinction between different types of text without using the normative/non-normative terminology. I don't think that's appropriate here. |
The whole document is a note, so nothing is normative. These messages are therefore confusing. Closes #25
The whole document is a note, so nothing is normative. These messages are therefore confusing. Closes #25
The whole document is a note, so nothing is normative. These messages are therefore confusing. Closes #25
The document will be published as a Note, so there is iiuc no normative aspect to the document.
Therefore we should remove the statements about normativeness from the start of sections 2 and 4, and collapse the references into a single section.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: