New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Editorial] wrong lines introduced by combining (and moving to respec) process #52
Comments
Chiba-san's edition information appears to be a problem dating from the port to Github. It's perhaps worth asking the question: Is it useful to indicate which of the 2 previous versions an editor was involved (?) We could list both affiliations for Kobayashi-san and Sasaki-san (?), or we could remove affiliations from previous editors. I suppose it depends whether we want to recognise the organisations that supported the work. (I have no preference.) |
I did check all links before posting. |
fixed
Fixed 24 links of this kind. Hopefully they include the 3 list above.
There appear to be 242 of these term references, but they also existed in https://www.w3.org/TR/jlreq/, so we need to try to understand whether or not there's a significance in the class name being termref2nd, instead of just termref. |
fixed
i think these will now be fixed as mentioned above. |
I reran the link checker, and there was only 1 problem: the link to the Japanese version of the doc in the SOTD at https://w3c.github.io/jlreq/#sotd. I made that link point to the current doc with ?lang=ja in the URL, and added another link to the English version. See 6cdaac3 |
(links added to the first comment - or description?) |
Kida-san (@kidayasuo ), let me propose to add this to agenda for our next F2F. |
gone toward the end of document. Added followings to the first comment (or description):
Also added issues:
|
I may misunderstand their behavior before... I saw several links says like 'Appendix B. xxxx' and respec is automatically switch between section mark and 'Appendix' following the target of link, but seems not true. |
closing this issue, all referenced issues closed |
not all could be editorial, but putting all here to list ones introduced by combining (and moving to respec?) process at 2019/May. (sorry that this is not from detailed comparison, but just skim through...)
Note: have not checked link targets; not including inconsistent applied links to terms references; WIP - for sections 1-3 as for now
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: