Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

removed id w3c_process_revision from Japanese text #216

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2020

Conversation

himorin
Copy link
Contributor

@himorin himorin commented Jun 11, 2020

for #141 (comment)


💥 Error: 500 Internal Server Error 💥

PR Preview failed to build. (Last tried on Jun 11, 2020, 7:15 AM UTC).

More

PR Preview relies on a number of web services to run. There seems to be an issue with the following one:

🚨 Spec Generator - Spec Generator is the web service used to build specs that rely on ReSpec.

🔗 Related URL

Navigation timeout of 30000 ms exceeded

If you don't have enough information above to solve the error by yourself (or to understand to which web service the error is related to, if any), please file an issue.

Copy link
Contributor

@r12a r12a left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've no idea what that was originally included for. As long as it doesn't change anything, i guess it's probably ok to remove it.

@himorin
Copy link
Contributor Author

himorin commented Jun 11, 2020

Actually, this is within directly translated text into Japanese from English text which respec inserts, and markups including this id was copied from (generated) English text as is...

@himorin himorin merged commit d7d6dd8 into w3c:gh-pages Jun 11, 2020
@xfq
Copy link
Member

xfq commented Jun 11, 2020

We can also change the id to something like w3c_process_revision_ja, but I doubt anyone will use it, so I'm OK with removing it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants