Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

flexfec: feature at risk? #709

Closed
aboba opened this issue May 24, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

flexfec: feature at risk? #709

aboba opened this issue May 24, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@aboba
Copy link
Contributor

aboba commented May 24, 2017

So far, there are no implementations of flexfec. Should this be marked as a "feature at risk?"
@ibc
Copy link
Contributor

ibc commented Jun 15, 2017

No please. I think FLEXFEC is the proper way of doing FEC. Using ULPFEC has proven to be weak, with some historical bugs/regressions at least in Chrome.

@robin-raymond
Copy link
Contributor

@ibc I agree, we don't have implementations (yet) but I know that when this spec gets better defined there is great interest in implementation. I think we do need to review the params for ORTC to make sure they are correct though.

@aboba aboba closed this as completed Jun 21, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@ibc @aboba @robin-raymond