possible error in OWL ODRL ontology?

[iherman]

(Recording the mail of Kerry Taylor as an issue)

Very nice work POE team. I think this is important work that needed to get out there!

I am looking at https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-vocab/#actionConcepts
And I see that “The includedIn property is transitive, and as such, the Actions form ancestor relationships.”

In contrast I see here: https://www.w3.org/ns/odrl/2/ODRL22.ttl that
“:includedIn

a rdf:Property, owl:ObjectProperty, owl:SymmetricProperty, skos:Concept ;”

I think perhaps the “owl:SymmetricProperty” in here should be, instead, “owl:TransitiveProperty”?

Btw, there is a tiny typo here: ” A Policy class MUST be disjoint will all Policy subclasses (except for Set).” In https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/PR-odrl-model-20180104/.

Yours
Kerry

Cc: @riannella

[vroddon]

I have only fixed the ontology error, not the English error.
See commit d636026

[iherman]

The ontology files have been updated on /ns/odrl/2/ on the W3C site.