-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Turtle* syntax tests #53
Comments
have the two modes been ratified - with a distinction in interpretation anchored in the syntax? |
@lisp - they are syntax tests. As per PR, description:
|
is the "annotation" syntax being considered for both modes? |
I put annotation examples in for discussion. I would have thought annotation applied to both SA and PG modes and I see nothing in the discussion to suggest it is anything other than a convenience syntax for Indeed, IMO it is one way to resolve the SA/PG choice. |
No, the way I see it, adding the annotation gives us a way to cover both modes, where the annotation syntax is for PG mode. By the way, there is a separate issue for the annotation syntax: #9 |
That would be my desired outcome. However, nothing has been ratified yet. |
then, the question becomes, is the test suite projective or prescriptive? |
The way as see it, nothing is prescriptive at the moment. |
@afs should we close this issue? This is not to mean that the corresponding test suite is complete -- in my view, it will always be possible to add new tests. But that's "normal process" and should not require an outstanding issue. |
I agree - the primary version of content is the documents and new issues can be raised for documents. |
This issue is for Turtle* syntax tests.
A first set is provided PR #52.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: