Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support custom header links in CG template #216

Closed
marcoscaceres opened this issue May 3, 2013 · 4 comments
Closed

Support custom header links in CG template #216

marcoscaceres opened this issue May 3, 2013 · 4 comments
Milestone

Comments

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

In #208, @darobin sez:

the CG document headers use a different template (there were just too many differences to factor them into a single template) and so won't benefit from this change. You could register this as a partial, and make it available in both.

@darobin
Copy link
Member

darobin commented Dec 23, 2014

Isn't this handled by otherLinks?

@darobin darobin added this to the 3.2 milestone Dec 23, 2014
@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member Author

I want to kill the otherLinks thing and just use a

... then ReSpec should grab the document's main dl (if present) and add configuration information to it - otherwise, it generates it, as it does today.

@darobin
Copy link
Member

darobin commented Jan 5, 2015

Sure, but that's a completely different bug.

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, so yes. This is handled by otherLinks.

shikhar-scs pushed a commit to shikhar-scs/respec that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2018
….js quite yet, but the pieces to use gulp to make a module are there. Next up will be updating the namespacing for everything, and moving over the helpers like convert_dates to MG.convert.date.
shikhar-scs pushed a commit to shikhar-scs/respec that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2018
…rs. We are now namespacing. MG is the top level.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants