Says Note but Pubrules rejects #653
Comments
|
I feel like this is a change @marcoscaceres pushed recently. If so, can he please back it out and then test a note against pubrules? |
|
I'll investigate. @michael-n-cooper, in the future (or if you are around), please paste in your ReSpec config. It helps us greatly with debugging. |
|
Here's the respec config. And BTW the behaviour is observed on var respecConfig = { // Embed RDFa data in the output. doRDFa: '1.1',
includePermalinks: true, permalinkEdge: true, permalinkHide: false, //
Specification status (e.g., WD, LC, NOTE, etc.). If in doubt use ED.
specStatus: "WD", // crEnd: "2012-04-30", // perEnd: "2013-07-23",
publishDate: "2016-03-17", noRecTrack: true, diffTool:
"http://www.aptest.com/standards/htmldiff/htmldiff.pl", // The
specifications short name, as in http://www.w3.org/TR/short-name/
shortName: "wai-aria-practices-1.1", // If you wish the publication date
to be other than today, // set publishDate. // publishDate:
"2009-08-06", copyrightStart: "2015", // If there is a previously
published draft, uncomment this // and set its YYYY-MM-DD date and its
maturity status. // previousPublishDate: "2015-11-19", previousMaturity:
"WD", // prevRecURI: "", // previousDiffURI: "", // If there a publicly
available Editors Draft, this is the link edDraftURI:
"http://w3c.github.io/aria/practices/aria-practices.html", // If this is
a LCWD, uncomment and set the end of its review period // lcEnd:
"2012-02-21", // Editors, add as many as you like. // “name” is the only
required field. editors: [ { name: "Matt King", mailto: "mck@fb.com",
company: "Facebook", companyURI: "http://www.facebook.com/" }, { name:
"James Nurthen", mailto: "james.nurthen@oracle.com", company: "Oracle
Corporation", companyURI: "http://www.oracle.com/" }, { name: "Michael
Cooper", url: 'http://www.w3.org/People/cooper/', mailto:
"cooper@w3.org", company: "W3C", companyURI: "http://www.w3.org/" }, {
name: "Michiel Bijl", mailto: "mbijl@paciellogroup.com", company: "The
Paciello Group", companyURI: "https://www.paciellogroup.com/" }, { name:
"Joseph Scheuhammer", company: "Inclusive Design Research Centre, OCAD
University", companyURI: "http://idrc.ocad.ca/", note: "Previous Editor"
}, { name: "Lisa Pappas", company: "SAS", companyURI:
"http://www.sas.com/", note: "Previous Editor" }, { name: "Rich
Schwerdtfeger", company: "IBM Corporation", companyURI:
"http://ibm.com/", note: "Previous Editor" }, ], // Authors, add as many
as you like. // This is optional, uncomment if you have authors as well
as editors. // Same format and requirements as editors. // authors: [ //
{ // name: "Your Name", // url: "http://example.org/", // company: "Your
Company", // companyURI: "http://example.com/" // }, // ], // Spec URLs
ariaSpecURLs: { "ED": "http://w3c.github.io/aria/aria/aria.html", "FPWD"
: "http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-1.1/", "WD" :
"http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-1.1/", "REC":
"http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/" }, accNameURLs: { "ED":
"http://w3c.github.io/aria/accname-aam/accname-aam.html", "WD" :
"http://www.w3.org/TR/accname-aam-1.1/", "FPWD":
"http://www.w3.org/TR/accname-aam-1.1/", "REC":
"http://www.w3.org/TR/accname-aam-1.1/" }, coreMappingURLs: { "ED":
"http://w3c.github.io/aria/core-aam/core-aam.html", "WD" :
"http://www.w3.org/TR/core-aam-1.1/", "FPWD":
"http://www.w3.org/TR/core-aam-1.1/", "REC":
"http://www.w3.org/TR/core-aam-1.1/" }, // alternateFormats: [ // { //
uri: 'aria-practices-diff.html', // label: "Diff from Previous
Recommendation" // }, // { // uri: 'aria-practices.ps', // label:
"PostScript version" // }, // { // uri: 'aria-practices.pdf', // label:
"PDF version" // } // ], // errata:
'http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/errata.html', // name of the WG wg:
"Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group", // URI of the
public WG page wgURI: "http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/", // Name (without
the @w3c.org) of the public mailing // to which comments are due.
wgPublicList: "public-aria", // URI of the patent status for this WG,
for Rec-track documents // !!!! IMPORTANT !!!! // This is important for
Rec-track documents, do not copy a patent URI // from a random document
unless you know what you're doing. // If in doubt ask your friendly
neighbourhood Team Contact. wgPatentURI:
"http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/83726/status", maxTocLevel: 4,
localBiblio: biblio, preProcess: [ linkCrossReferences ] }; |
|
Beautified config: var respecConfig = {
// Embed RDFa data in the output.
doRDFa: '1.1',
includePermalinks: true,
permalinkEdge: true,
permalinkHide: false,
// Specification status (e.g., WD, LC, NOTE, etc.). If in doubt use ED.
specStatus: "WD",
// crEnd: "2012-04-30",
// perEnd: "2013-07-23",
publishDate: "2016-03-17",
noRecTrack: true,
diffTool: "http://www.aptest.com/standards/htmldiff/htmldiff.pl",
// The specifications short name, as in http://www.w3.org/TR/short-name/
shortName: "wai-aria-practices-1.1",
// If you wish the publication date to be other than today,
// set publishDate.
// publishDate: "2009-08-06",
copyrightStart: "2015",
// If there is a previously published draft, uncomment this
// and set its YYYY-MM-DD date and its maturity status.
//
previousPublishDate: "2015-11-19",
previousMaturity: "WD",
// prevRecURI: "",
// previousDiffURI: "",
// If there a publicly available Editors Draft, this is the link
edDraftURI: "http://w3c.github.io/aria/practices/aria-practices.html",
// If this is a LCWD, uncomment and set the end of its review period
// lcEnd: "2012-02-21",
// Editors, add as many as you like.
// “name” is the only required field.
editors: [{
name: "Matt King",
mailto: "mck@fb.com",
company: "Facebook",
companyURI: "http://www.facebook.com/"
}, {
name: "James Nurthen",
mailto: "james.nurthen@oracle.com",
company: "Oracle Corporation",
companyURI: "http://www.oracle.com/"
}, {
name: "Michael Cooper",
url: 'http://www.w3.org/People/cooper/',
mailto: "cooper@w3.org",
company: "W3C",
companyURI: "http://www.w3.org/"
}, {
name: "Michiel Bijl",
mailto: "mbijl@paciellogroup.com",
company: "The Paciello Group",
companyURI: "https://www.paciellogroup.com/"
}, {
name: "Joseph Scheuhammer",
company: "Inclusive Design Research Centre, OCAD University",
companyURI: "http://idrc.ocad.ca/",
note: "Previous Editor"
}, {
name: "Lisa Pappas",
company: "SAS",
companyURI: "http://www.sas.com/",
note: "Previous Editor"
}, {
name: "Rich Schwerdtfeger",
company: "IBM Corporation",
companyURI: "http://ibm.com/",
note: "Previous Editor"
}, ],
// Authors, add as many as you like.
// This is optional, uncomment if you have authors as well as editors.
// Same format and requirements as editors.
// authors: [
// {
// name: "Your Name",
// url: "http://example.org/",
// company: "Your Company",
// companyURI: "http://example.com/"
// },
// ],
// Spec URLs
ariaSpecURLs: {
"ED": "http://w3c.github.io/aria/aria/aria.html",
"FPWD": "http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-1.1/",
"WD": "http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-1.1/",
"REC": "http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/"
},
accNameURLs: {
"ED": "http://w3c.github.io/aria/accname-aam/accname-aam.html",
"WD": "http://www.w3.org/TR/accname-aam-1.1/",
"FPWD": "http://www.w3.org/TR/accname-aam-1.1/",
"REC": "http://www.w3.org/TR/accname-aam-1.1/"
},
coreMappingURLs: {
"ED": "http://w3c.github.io/aria/core-aam/core-aam.html",
"WD": "http://www.w3.org/TR/core-aam-1.1/",
"FPWD": "http://www.w3.org/TR/core-aam-1.1/",
"REC": "http://www.w3.org/TR/core-aam-1.1/"
},
// alternateFormats: [
// {
// uri: 'aria-practices-diff.html',
// label: "Diff from Previous Recommendation"
// },
// {
// uri: 'aria-practices.ps',
// label: "PostScript version"
// },
// {
// uri: 'aria-practices.pdf',
// label: "PDF version"
// }
// ],
// errata: 'http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/errata.html',
// name of the WG
wg: "Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group",
// URI of the public WG page
wgURI: "http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/",
// Name (without the @w3c.org) of the public mailing
// to which comments are due.
wgPublicList: "public-aria",
// URI of the patent status for this WG, for Rec-track documents
// !!!! IMPORTANT !!!!
// This is important for Rec-track documents, do not copy a patent URI
// from a random document unless you know what you're doing.
// If in doubt ask your friendly neighbourhood Team Contact.
wgPatentURI: "http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/83726/status",
maxTocLevel: 4,
localBiblio: biblio,
preProcess: [linkCrossReferences]
}; |
marcoscaceres
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 15, 2016
Fix (sotd.html): Move noRecTrack text to own para (closes #653)
marcoscaceres
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 15, 2016
* develop: v3.2.113 Fix (sotd.html): Move noRecTrack text to own para (closes #653) Fix (w3c/style.js): pubrules requires props in explicit order
|
The change does not fix the problem with Pubrules rejecting the generated Status paragraph. It just moves it to a different place that Pubrules does not accept. We could argue about whether Pubrules has reasonable expectations, but I just need a clean Pubrules report in order to publish. |
|
Uggh. I am feeling stabby now. @marcoscaceres I am ripping this crap out until we get pubrules fixed. |
|
Strange. I ran the document over pub rules yesterday and it seemed happy. Sent from my iPhone
|
|
New pubrules or old? Webmaster only tests against old :( |
|
Wait, what? Sent from my iPhone
|
|
Echidna uses the new pubrules checker magic, but the webmaster does not. So we need to be testing our output against the old pubrules checker. That's the standard. Supposedly changing in July, right @plehegar ? |
|
I think this was fixed by #661. |
|
hu? the webmaster uses the new pubrules. The old pubrules has been retired. |
shikhar-scs
pushed a commit
to shikhar-scs/respec
that referenced
this issue
Feb 19, 2018
Fix w3c#653 : removed unused es6-module-transpiler
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The latest Respec, at time of this filing, inserts the following text into the Status:
It is expected to become a W3C Note.
Pubrules rejects this as and declares the entire patent policy paragraph invalid (section 10). I can't point to a URI to demonstrate this because I am manually removing the offending text in order to pass pubrules and be able to publish. The version of Pubrules is at https://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules?uimode=checker_full&uri= and raises this error on a doc with noRecTrack: true in the respec config.
I previously said this error had gone away after a hard refresh.
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2016JanMar/0062.html
That turns out to be incorrect. I must have already reverted my staging doc to the known-working version of respec when I asserted that. This issue is still present in the current version of Respec.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: