Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Put note text back the way it was. #661

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 15, 2016
Merged

Put note text back the way it was. #661

merged 2 commits into from Mar 15, 2016

Conversation

halindrome
Copy link
Contributor

To fix issue #653. This puts everything back the way it was. 'cause notes dont pass pubrules now.

halindrome added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2016
Put note text back the way it was.
@halindrome halindrome merged commit 5cbb78b into develop Mar 15, 2016
@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

Can I kindly ask that PRs not be merged without review. We shouldn't hot fix stuff as it just introduces more cruft. It is possible for users to self-fix the generated versions, while we figure out appropriate solutions to bugs.

@halindrome
Copy link
Contributor Author

You are of course correct. In my defense, I should never have agreed to the original change in the first place. In fact, when I went and looked at the PR there were other things in there I wouldn't have agreed to had I actually been paying attention when I looked at it. That's my fault.

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

On 16 Mar 2016, at 7:08 PM, Shane McCarron notifications@github.com wrote:

You are of course correct. In my defense, I should never have agreed to the original change in the first place. In fact, when I went and looked at the PR there were other things in there I wouldn't have agreed to had I actually been paying attention when I looked at it. That's my fault.

I wouldn't say it's your fault, but the process is there for a reason (and I strongly believe it works): Marcos, or any of the maintainers, will on occasion propose less than ideal PRs. Each PR requires as much consideration from the reviewer as the code the PR adds/removes. Having said that, we will on occasion make mistakes. And that's totally ok. We have the luxury here that, in an organization where it takes on average 5 years to get to REC, a delay of a day or two fixing a bug or merging a PR is not a big deal.

So, it's totally ok to say, "I don't like this... I need to sleep on it... Have you maybe thought of doing it this way... Etc."


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres deleted the restore_note_text branch March 17, 2016 02:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants