Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve patent text on notes #1446

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Dec 18, 2017
Merged

Improve patent text on notes #1446

merged 3 commits into from Dec 18, 2017

Conversation

marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member Author

@deniak, let me know if this looks right.

Copy link
Member

@deniak deniak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@marcoscaceres Except for the name of the status, that PR looks good.

@@ -634,11 +634,23 @@ export function run(conf, doc, cb) {
conf.isPR = conf.specStatus === "PR";
conf.isPER = conf.specStatus === "PER";
conf.isMO = conf.specStatus === "MO";
conf.isNote = conf.specStatus === "NOTE";
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking at the documentation, shouldn't the status be WG-NOTE?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are correct, there is also FPWD-NOTE, it seems. I still don't know why we have "NOTE"? It seems to be "a thing" - it has an associated W3C Style? Should we kill that?

it("gracefully handles missing wgPatentURI", async () => {
const ops = makeStandardOps();
const newProps = {
specStatus: "NOTE",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

WG-NOTE instead of NOTE?

const ops = makeStandardOps();
const newProps = {
wgPatentURI: "https://www.w3.org/pp-impl/123456/status",
specStatus: "NOTE",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

WG-NOTE instead of NOTE?

@@ -634,11 +634,23 @@ export function run(conf, doc, cb) {
conf.isPR = conf.specStatus === "PR";
conf.isPER = conf.specStatus === "PER";
conf.isMO = conf.specStatus === "MO";
conf.isNote = ["FPWD-NOTE", "WG-NOTE"].includes(conf.specStatus);
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@deniak, let me know if "FPWD-NOTE" applies or not. I'm was unsure.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I think that applies too!

@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres merged commit 51fefa0 into develop Dec 18, 2017
@marcoscaceres marcoscaceres deleted the patent_note branch December 18, 2017 22:28
@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member Author

Will release later today.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Upcoming update to WG notes patent policy text
2 participants